Citizens' Center for Nuclear Non-ProliferationRussian Nuclear Non-Proliferation Site
Main   Russian
Search:
Exclusive | Archive | Publications | About us | Links | Forum | Guestbook

By Carol E. Lee, Alastair Gale,
The Wall Street Journal & Foreign Policy,
3 March 2017

White House explores options, including use of military force, to counter North Korean threat

An internal White House review of strategy on North Korea includes the possibility of military force or regime change to blunt the country`s nuclear-weapons threat, people familiar with the process said, a prospect that has some U.S. allies in the region on edge.

While President Donald Trump has taken steps to reassure allies that he won`t abandon agreements that have underpinned decades of U.S. policy on Asia, his pledge that Pyongyang would be stopped from ever testing an intercontinental ballistic missile-coupled with the two-week-old strategy review-has some leaders bracing for a shift in American policy.

The U.S. review comes as recent events have strained regional stability. Last month, North Korea launched a ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan, and the estranged half brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was assassinated in Malaysia.

Chinese and North Korean officials are holding talks in Beijing, the first known high-level meeting in nearly a year, and Beijing recently curtailed coal imports from North Korea.

U.S. officials have underscored the possible military dimensions of their emerging strategy in recent discussions with allies, according to people familiar with the talks.

During Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe`s two-day summit in February with Mr. Trump, U.S. officials on several occasions stated that all options were under consideration to deal with North Korea, according to a person familiar with the discussions.

It was clear to the Japanese side that those options encompassed a U.S. military strike on North Korea, possibly if Pyongyang appeared ready to test an ICBM, this person said. The Japanese side found that scenario "worrisome," he said.


Your opinion (comments to the article)?


Your name:

Your comments:

Please enter the code exactly as shown in image format.



More:

  • Why oil predictions are so wild right now-from $42 to $100 a barrel. Oil stockpiles are at historic highs and price prognostications are all over the map. By Bart Chilton, CNBC, USA, 24 April 2017

  • Pentagon begins Nuclear Posture Review. By Luis Martinez, ABC News, 19 April 2017

  • While the U.S. wasn`t looking, Russia and Iran began carving out a bigger role in Afghanistan. By Erin Cunningham, The Washington Post, 15 April 2017

  • Why Trump`s missiles are shaking Putin`s home front. He may be the hero of Crimea, but for the Russian leader the US strike on Syria could hardly have come at a worse moment. By Mary Dejevsky, The Guardian, UK, 12 April 2017

  • Under Trump, the United States May Now Be Killing More Civilians Than Russia. With mass-casualty events from Raqqa to Mosul, some think the US military is scrapping rules designed to protect innocents. By Peter Certo, The Nation, Pakistan, 1 April 2017

  • Why Erdogan Seeks to Provoke European Leaders. By Leonid Bershidsky, Bloomberg, 27 March 2017

  • Dermokratiya, USA. With rampant talk of Russian interference, it`s worth recounting Washington`s role in undermining Russia`s 1996 election. By Sean Guillory, Jacobin, USA, 27 March 2017
  • Advertising

    @Mail.ru
    Exclusive | Archive | Publications | About us | Links | Forum | Guestbook
    Home   Up   Back

    General Post Office, P.B. 25211, Krasnoyarsk, 600000. Russia.
    e-mail: ccnnp@yandex.ru, NuclearNo.com
    © 2000. Design: NuclearNo.ru