Citizens' Center for Nuclear Non-ProliferationRussian Nuclear Non-Proliferation Site
Main   Russian
Search:
Exclusive | Archive | Publications | About us | Links | Forum | Guestbook

By Daniel Larison,
The American Conservative,
11 February 2017

Trump, New START, and U.S. - Russian Relations

Reuters reports that Trump didn`t know what New START was, but was sure it must be a bad deal:

In his first call as president with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump denounced a treaty that caps U.S. and Russian deployment of nuclear warheads as a bad deal for the United States, according to two U.S. officials and one former U.S. official with knowledge of the call.

When Putin raised the possibility of extending the 2010 treaty, known as New START, Trump paused to ask his aides in an aside what the treaty was [bold mine-DL], these sources said.

Trump then told Putin the treaty was one of several bad deals negotiated by the Obama administration [bold mine-DL], saying that New START favored Russia. Trump also talked about his own popularity, the sources said.

The account rings true, and it fits in with Trump`s views on agreements made during the Obama years. If an agreement was reached with another government when Obama was president, Trump takes it for granted that it must be a bad deal that benefits the other side more. This is what he always thinks about deals not made by him, and it is typically paired with total ignorance of the substance of the agreement that he is criticizing. This is how he concludes that the nuclear deal is a "very bad deal" despite the fact that he appears to understand nothing about it and gets basic facts about it wrong. He doesn`t concern himself with the details because he already knows that the deal must be to our disadvantage, since he takes it as a given that the U.S. has been getting "ripped off" in everything. The result is that the supposed deal-maker is against any successful diplomatic agreement that has already been negotiated.

In the case of New START, it was conventional hawkish boilerplate back in 2009-2010 that Russia benefited more from the treaty, but this wasn`t true. It represented the continuation of a mutually beneficial arms reduction process, and it ensured that reductions by both sides would be verified by inspections. Romney made a point of denouncing the treaty ahead of his second presidential campaign, and he made his opposition to the treaty a major part of his anti-Russian/anti-Obama rhetoric as a candidate. If Trump is now echoing the shoddy arguments against New START, that suggests that he doesn`t understand that arms control is one of the major areas where U.S.-Russian cooperation is very important, and it also means that he is getting very bad advice from the same kinds of people that Romney was listening to back then. That`s bad news for improving relations with Russia.


Your opinion (comments to the article)?


Your name:

Your comments:

Please enter the code exactly as shown in image format.



More:

  • South Korea Says There`s a Chance the North Will Conduct Its Sixth Nuclear Test on Tuesday. By Kim Tong-Hyung, Time, 24 April 2017

  • How Champs Elysees attack could swing the French presidential election. By Henry Samuel, Paris, The Telegraph, UK, 24 April 2017

  • What Erdogan`s narrow referendum victory means for Turkey. By Ishaan Tharoor, The Washington Post, 19 April 2017

  • Trump Stumbles into Putin`s Syrian Backyard. By Nina L. Khrushcheva, Project Syndicate, 15 April 2017

  • What could go wrong for the U.S. in Syria? War with Russia.... Pressure to escalate is only going to get worse. By Colin H. Kahl, The Washington Post, 12 April 2017

  • Russia has many enemies - but its actions in Syria may have contributed to events in St Petersburg. Russia`s intervention in Syria and Chechnya has led to threats from groups such as Isis, although responsibility for the St Petersburg attack has yet to be established. By Kim Sengupta, Diplomatic Editor, The Independent, UK, 5 April 2017

  • "Global collection of bases" of the Pentagon. (russian.) By Vladimir Shenk, publicist, Israel, special for NuclearNo.com, 1 April 2017
  • Advertising

    @Mail.ru
    Exclusive | Archive | Publications | About us | Links | Forum | Guestbook
    Home   Up   Back

    General Post Office, P.B. 25211, Krasnoyarsk, 600000. Russia.
    e-mail: ccnnp@yandex.ru, NuclearNo.com
    © 2000. Design: NuclearNo.ru