Logo Russian Nuclear Non-Proliferation Site Russian Nuclear Non-Proliferation Site
Citizens' Center on Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Home   Russian
Search for:
Exclusive | Archive | Publications | About us | Links | Forum | Guestbook

By Joby Warrick, Anne E. Kornblut,
The Washington Post,
28 January 2010

U.S. is unprepared for major bioterrorism attack, commission finds

More than eight years after the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks, the United States is still unprepared to respond to the threat of large-scale bioterrorism, a congressionally appointed commission said Tuesday in a report that gave the government mixed grades overall for how it has protected Americans from weapons of mass destruction.

The report, which measured the government`s performance in 17 key areas, gave the White House and Congress "F" grades for not building a rapid-response capability for dealing with disease outbreaks from bioterrorism, or providing adequate oversight of security and intelligence agencies.

Within hours of the report`s release, the Obama administration revealed plans to fill gaps in the nation`s public health defenses with a series of initiatives to be announced in Wednesday`s State of the Union address. The proposals, which administration officials said had been in the works well before the report`s findings were known, will seek to speed up delivery of drugs in the event of a major attack, addressing one of the principal shortcomings identified by the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism.

President Obama`s speech will include a "call to action" to various government leaders to redesign the way medical countermeasures are mass produced, White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said. "The goal is a national capability for the rapid, reliable and affordable production of an array of medical countermeasures against public health threats."

The WMD panel cited the government`s faltering response to the swine flu epidemic as evidence of a lack of preparedness for a large-scale crisis, adding that the blame for the failures is shared by various administrations and branches of government.

"Each of the last three administrations has been slow to recognize and respond to the biothreat," said former senator Bob Graham (D-Fla.), who co-chaired the panel along with former senator James M. Talent (R-Mo.). "But we no longer have the luxury of a slow learning curve when we know al-Qaeda is interested in bioweapons."

The panel`s "report card" comes 13 months after the congressionally appointed body warned that a major attack using weapons of mass destruction somewhere in the world was "more likely than not" to occur by 2013, unless significant steps were taken.

The panel gave "A" grades for government programs that secured dangerous viruses and bacteria, and for the administration`s reorganization of the National Security Council to better deal with WMD threats. The report cited the White House`s efforts to strengthen international controls on nuclear technology and components, but said there had been "no equal sense of urgency displayed towards the threat of a large-scale biological weapons attack."


Your opinion (comments to the article)?


Your name:

Your comments:

Please enter the code exactly as shown in image format.



More:

  • IAEA report: What`s driving Iran`s latest bout of nuclear obstinacy. Following an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report that charges Iran with obstructing inspectors of its nuclear program, Iran said Tuesday that it can rightfully replace nuclear inspectors. By Scott Peterson, The Christian Science Monitor, 9 September 2010

  • The Moral Challenge of a Nuclear-Free World. Like climate change, nuclear disarmament raises the question of whether mankind can feel a sense of responsibility across national borders and generations. By Katsuya Okada, Guido Westerwelle, The Wall Street Journal, 5 September 2010

  • Pakistan`s nuclear arsenal has prevented war with India: A. Q. Khan. The Times of India, 4 September 2010

  • Tony Blair: West should use force if Iran "continues to develop nuclear weapons". Former prime minister says it is wholly unacceptable for Tehran to seek nuclear weapons capability. By Mark Tran, The Guardian, UK, 3 September 2010

  • A trillion-dollar catastrophe. Yes, Iraq was a headline war. Mission accomplished? The Iraq war did more than anything to alienate the Atlantic powers from the rest of the world. By Simon Jenkins, The Guardian, UK, 3 September 2010

  • Nuclear Forensics: A Tool For Deterring Terrorists?. By Reshmi Kazi, Eurasia Review, 2 September 2010

  • Ex-USSR awash in radioactive "dirty bomb" substances. By Olga Nedbayeva, Agence France-Presse, 30 August 2010

  • Rambler's Top100 Ðåéòèíã@Mail.ru ñÎÄÅËÓ ÃÉÔÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ
    Exclusive | Archive | Publications | About us | Links | Forum | Guestbook
    Home   Up   Back

    General Post Office, P.B. 25211, Krasnoyarsk, 600000. Russia.
    e-mail: ccnnp@yandex.ru, NuclearNo.com
    © 2000. Design: NuclearNo.ru